Winning a Judicial Review Claim for Bail Appeals: A Legal Primer

In the legal case of R (Molina) v Snaresbrook Crown Court [2024] EWHC 816 (Admin), the High Court made a significant ruling in favor of the claimant, highlighting the crucial importance of safeguarding individual liberty. This decision reflects a recent trend in habeas corpus rulings that prioritize the protection of personal freedom. Acting as the Divisional Court in this particular matter, Davies LJ and Bennathan J identified several key issues where the Resident Judge of Snaresbrook Crown Court had erred.

These included exceeding her jurisdiction, incorrectly assessing the notification requirements, and wrongly assuming authority over bail matters within the context of the case being heard in the Crown Court. Furthermore, the court determined that the Crown Prosecution Service had proceeded unlawfully, despite being aware of their lack of jurisdiction. For further details, individuals can refer to the RLC's website for specific information on this groundbreaking judicial review claim relating to bail appeals.

The full judgment document is also available for review online. Notably, Alex Benn, represented by Canel Halil from Emery Halil Brown Solicitors, was praised in the court's ruling for diligently upholding his obligations to the legal system and advocating effectively for his client's rights.